Aller au contenu
EXYS
Retour aux CVE

CVE-2026-79983

9,1, critique

Apache Software Foundation Apache Camel Path Traversal Vulnerability

CVSS
9,1, critique critique CVSS v3.1
EPSS, 30 prochains jours
0,7% supérieur à 51,5% des CVE notées
Exploitation
Aucune preuve publique
Publiée
19 oct. 2026il y a 16 jours

Description

Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability in Apache Camel FTP component. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.0.0 before 4.18.5, from 4.19.0 before 4.22.1. The Camel remote-file consumers poll a directory on a remote server and build the absolute remote path of each file by concatenating the configured directory with the file name reported in the server's directory listing. That concatenation (FtpUtils.absoluteFilePath and GenericFileConsumer) applied no lexical normalization and no check that the result stayed inside the directory being polled, and the resulting path became the operand for every subsequent remote operation on the file: retrieval (FtpOperations.retrieveFile / SftpOperations, reached from GenericFileConsumer where the retrieve name is taken verbatim from GenericFile.getAbsoluteFilePath), deletion when delete=true (GenericFileDeleteProcessStrategy), and renaming when move, preMove, moveFailed or readLock=rename is configured (GenericFileProcessStrategySupport and GenericFileRenameExclusiveReadLockStrategy). Neither isValidFile nor isMatched performed any containment check. A listing entry that is not a single path segment therefore resolved to a path outside the configured polling directory, causing Camel to read, delete or rename files outside it using the endpoint's own credentials. A listing name is not route-controlled data. It is supplied by the remote server, and the FTP control channel carries no integrity protection at all, so an on-path attacker can rewrite a LIST response without holding any credentials; a compromised, malicious or multi-tenant server, or a server backed by a virtual filesystem, can emit such a name directly. Retrieval is reachable in a default consumer configuration, since the remote consumers download every listed file; deletion and renaming additionally require one of the disposition options above, all of which are common. Escape from the directory Camel was configured to poll is unconditional, while escape from the server's own account boundary additionally depends on whether that server confines the account. The jailStartingDirectory option, which is documented as restricting Camel to the starting directory and is enabled by default, governed producer writes and, since the localWorkDirectory containment work, consumer downloads to the local work directory - but it did not constrain this remote operand, so its name and description claimed a boundary that was not enforced here. The same entry point had already been recognised on the local side: the localWorkDirectory download path was constrained so that a remote file name containing parent-directory segments could not resolve outside the local work directory. The remote operand was the remaining half of that surface. This artifact provides the ftp, ftps and sftp schemes, all of which are affected. The reporter demonstrated the issue end to end against an ftp endpoint, driving a Camel route with a malicious server whose LIST response named a file outside the polled directory. Upgrade to Apache Camel 4.23.0, which fixes the issue. Users on the 4.22.x releases stream should upgrade to 4.22.1. Users on the 4.18.x LTS releases stream should upgrade to 4.18.5. The 4.14.x stream reached end of life and does not receive this fix; users on it should move to a supported releases stream.

Détails

Éditeur
Apache Software Foundation
Produit
Apache Camel
Faiblesse
CWE-22 (s'ouvre dans un nouvel onglet)
Statut
Analysée
Mise à jour
3 nov. 2026
Attribuée par
security@apache.org

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Références 7

Le type est déduit des étiquettes de NVD lorsqu'elles existent, sinon de la forme de l'URL : considérez-le comme un indice.

Même éditeur parmi les CVE de notre base ; cela n'implique aucun lien connu entre ces failles.

  • CVE-2026-64618 Apache Software Foundation Apache Fineract SQL Injection Vulnerability EPSS 0,6% 9,8, critique
  • CVE-2026-65874 Apache Software Foundation Apache Fineract SQL Injection Vulnerability EPSS 0,6% 8,8, élevé
  • CVE-2026-78162 Apache Software Foundation Apache Camel Deserialization of Untrusted Data Vulnerability EPSS 0,9% 9,8, critique
  • CVE-2026-79986 Apache Software Foundation Apache Camel Path Traversal Vulnerability EPSS 0,6% 9,1, critique
  • CVE-2026-92414 Apache Software Foundation Apache Jackrabbit Session Fixation Vulnerability EPSS 0,7% 9,1, critique
  • CVE-2026-104714 Apache Software Foundation Apache Struts Race Condition Vulnerability EPSS 0,5% 8,8, élevé
  • CVE-2026-86089 Apache Software Foundation Apache NiFi Missing Authorization Vulnerability EPSS 0,4% 7,1, élevé
  • CVE-2026-87976 Apache Software Foundation Apache NiFi Registry Path Traversal Vulnerability EPSS 0,8% 8,1, élevé

Au-delà de cette page

CVE-2026-79983 est-elle présente sur votre réseau ?

Cette page vous dit à quel point CVE-2026-79983 est dangereuse de manière générale. Savoir si elle se trouve sur l'un de vos appareils, seul un scan de votre propre réseau peut le dire. C'est ce que font nos systèmes, chaque jour, pour les entreprises que nous protégeons.

  • EXYS7600 OCELOT

    La trouver avant les attaquants

    Ocelot analyse votre réseau de manière planifiée et signale chaque vulnérabilité trouvée avec son identifiant CVE, son score CVSS et le nombre de vos hôtes touchés. Chaque résultat, comme CVE-2026-79983, est accompagné de la liste des appareils à corriger.

    Découvrir EXYS7600 OCELOT
  • EXYS7950 KONDRA

    La détecter si elle est exploitée

    Tant que le correctif n'est pas installé, Kondra surveille le réseau, les événements et les terminaux en temps réel. Il tient l'inventaire des logiciels installés sur chaque terminal, et ses règles de détection d'anomalies signalent ce que fait un attaquant une fois dans le réseau.

    Découvrir EXYS7950 KONDRA
Vérifier votre exposition

Compilé à partir de l'API NVD 2.0, du catalogue Known Exploited Vulnerabilities de la CISA et de FIRST EPSS. Les scores correspondent à notre dernière collecte du 4 nov. 2026, pas à l'état actuel des sources.