CVE Intelligence
Exploited and newly published vulnerabilities, ranked by whether they are being used, how likely they are to be, and whether a patch exists.
- CVEs held
- 3,186
- each with its own record page
- KEV listed, 30 days
- 35
- newest 16 Oct 2026
- Ransomware-linked
- 361
- confirmed by CISA
- Public exploit
- 883
- exploit code referenced
- Vendors
- 654
- named in affected products
- EPSS 90% or more
- 468
- 100% already known exploited
Counts of what we hold, not of every CVE ever filed. Collected from NVD, the CISA KEV catalogue (version 2026.10.16) and FIRST EPSS. Last collected .
Results
Our full local dataset: the complete known-exploited catalogue plus the high- and critical-severity CVEs published inside the collection window. It is a few thousand records, not the full CVE corpus; anything older and never exploited is not here.
| CVE | Title | Vendor | KEV listed | Published | EPSS | CVSS | Signals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2017-1000353 | CVE-2017-1000353 | Jenkins and 1 more vendor | 100% | 9.8, critical | overdue exploit 2 patch 1 advisory 2 | ||
| CVE-2018-0802 | CVE-2018-0802 | Microsoft | 93% | 7.8, high | ransomware overdue exploit 3 patch 1 | ||
| CVE-2018-0798 | CVE-2018-0798 | Microsoft | 95% | 8.8, high | overdue patch 2 advisory 2 | ||
| CVE-2017-1000486 | CVE-2017-1000486 | Primetek | 94% | 9.8, critical | overdue exploit 2 advisory 2 | ||
| CVE-2017-17562 | CVE-2017-17562 | Embedthis and 1 more vendor | 96% | 8.1, high | overdue exploit 3 patch 2 advisory 3 | ||
| CVE-2017-15944 | CVE-2017-15944 | Palo Alto Networks | 98% | 9.8, critical | overdue exploit 2 advisory 3 | ||
| CVE-2017-11882 | CVE-2017-11882 | Microsoft | 100% | 7.8, high | ransomware overdue exploit 10 patch 1 | ||
| CVE-2017-16651 | CVE-2017-16651 | Roundcube and 1 more vendor | 46% | 7.8, high | overdue exploit 1 patch 1 advisory 7 | ||
| CVE-2017-5070 | CVE-2017-5070 | Google and 4 more vendors | 32% | 8.8, high | overdue exploit 1 advisory 5 | ||
| CVE-2017-11292 | CVE-2017-11292 | Adobe and 5 more vendors | 12% | 8.8, high | overdue patch 1 advisory 4 | ||
| CVE-2017-10271 | CVE-2017-10271 | Oracle | 100% | 7.5, high | ransomware overdue exploit 3 patch 1 | ||
| CVE-2017-11826 | CVE-2017-11826 | Microsoft | 81% | 7.8, high | overdue exploit 2 patch 1 advisory 3 | ||
| CVE-2017-11774 | CVE-2017-11774 | Microsoft | 60% | 7.8, high | overdue exploit 1 patch 1 advisory 2 | ||
| CVE-2017-1000253 | CVE-2017-1000253 | Linux and 2 more vendors | 11% | 7.8, high | ransomware overdue patch 1 advisory 12 | ||
| CVE-2017-12617 | CVE-2017-12617 | Apache | 100% | 8.1, high | overdue exploit 2 patch 20 advisory 21 | ||
| CVE-2017-12149 | CVE-2017-12149 | Red Hat | 91% | 9.8, critical | ransomware overdue advisory 4 | ||
| CVE-2017-12240 | CVE-2017-12240 | Cisco | 14% | 9.8, critical | overdue advisory 5 | ||
| CVE-2017-12238 | CVE-2017-12238 | Cisco | 2% | 6.5, medium | overdue advisory 3 | ||
| CVE-2017-12237 | CVE-2017-12237 | Cisco | 7% | 7.5, high | overdue advisory 3 | ||
| CVE-2017-12235 | CVE-2017-12235 | Cisco | 7% | 7.5, high | overdue advisory 3 | ||
| CVE-2017-12234 | CVE-2017-12234 | Cisco | 7% | 7.5, high | overdue advisory 3 | ||
| CVE-2017-12233 | CVE-2017-12233 | Cisco | 7% | 7.5, high | overdue advisory 3 | ||
| CVE-2017-12232 | CVE-2017-12232 | Cisco | 2% | 6.5, medium | overdue advisory 3 | ||
| CVE-2017-12231 | CVE-2017-12231 | Cisco | 7% | 7.5, high | overdue advisory 3 | ||
| CVE-2015-1187 | CVE-2015-1187 | D-Link and TRENDnet and 1 more vendor | 83% | 9.8, critical | overdue exploit 3 advisory 3 | ||
| CVE-2017-12615 | CVE-2017-12615 | Apache | 100% | 8.1, high | ransomware overdue exploit 3 patch 4 | ||
| CVE-2017-9805 | CVE-2017-9805 | Apache | 99% | 8.1, high | overdue exploit 1 patch 1 advisory 9 | ||
| CVE-2017-8759 | CVE-2017-8759 | Microsoft | 89% | 7.8, high | overdue exploit 3 patch 1 advisory 3 | ||
| CVE-2017-6627 | CVE-2017-6627 | Cisco | 6% | 7.5, high | overdue advisory 3 | ||
| CVE-2017-11357 | CVE-2017-11357 | Telerik | 78% | 9.8, critical | ransomware overdue exploit 1 advisory 1 | ||
| CVE-2017-11317 | CVE-2017-11317 | Telerik | 84% | 9.8, critical | overdue exploit 2 advisory 2 | ||
| CVE-2017-6327 | CVE-2017-6327 | Symantec | 36% | 8.8, high | overdue exploit 2 advisory 2 | ||
| CVE-2015-2291 | CVE-2015-2291 | Intel and 1 more vendor | 9% | 7.8, high | ransomware overdue exploit 2 patch 1 | ||
| CVE-2017-6663 | CVE-2017-6663 | Cisco | 2% | 6.5, medium | overdue advisory 3 | ||
| CVE-2017-12637 | CVE-2017-12637 | SAP | 95% | 7.5, high | overdue advisory 1 | ||
| CVE-2017-9822 | CVE-2017-9822 | DotNetNuke (DNN) | 95% | 8.8, high | ransomware overdue exploit 1 advisory 2 | ||
| CVE-2017-6316 | CVE-2017-6316 | Citrix | 73% | 9.8, critical | overdue exploit 2 advisory 2 | ||
| CVE-2017-6744 | CVE-2017-6744 | Cisco and 1 more vendor | 7% | 8.8, high | overdue advisory 1 | ||
| CVE-2017-6743 | CVE-2017-6743 | Cisco and 1 more vendor | 11% | 8.8, high | overdue advisory 4 | ||
| CVE-2017-6742 | CVE-2017-6742 | Cisco and 1 more vendor | 21% | 8.8, high | overdue advisory 4 | ||
| CVE-2017-6740 | CVE-2017-6740 | Cisco and 1 more vendor | 11% | 8.8, high | overdue advisory 4 | ||
| CVE-2017-6739 | CVE-2017-6739 | Cisco | 11% | 8.8, high | overdue advisory 4 | ||
| CVE-2017-6738 | CVE-2017-6738 | Cisco | 11% | 8.8, high | overdue advisory 4 | ||
| CVE-2017-6737 | CVE-2017-6737 | Cisco | 45% | 8.8, high | overdue advisory 4 | ||
| CVE-2017-6736 | CVE-2017-6736 | Cisco and 1 more vendor | 70% | 8.8, high | overdue exploit 2 advisory 4 | ||
| CVE-2017-8570 | CVE-2017-8570 | Microsoft | 90% | 7.8, high | overdue exploit 2 patch 1 advisory 2 | ||
| CVE-2017-9791 | CVE-2017-9791 | Apache | 99% | 9.8, critical | overdue exploit 2 patch 1 advisory 4 | ||
| CVE-2017-9248 | CVE-2017-9248 | Progress and 1 more vendor | 75% | 9.8, critical | overdue exploit 1 advisory 3 | ||
| CVE-2017-9841 | CVE-2017-9841 | PHPUnit and 1 more vendor | 100% | 9.8, critical | overdue patch 3 advisory 4 | ||
| CVE-2017-8543 | CVE-2017-8543 | Microsoft | 74% | 9.8, critical | overdue patch 1 advisory 2 | ||
| CVE-2017-8464 | CVE-2017-8464 | Microsoft | 90% | 8.8, high | overdue exploit 2 patch 1 advisory 2 | ||
| CVE-2016-7836 | CVE-2016-7836 | SKYSEA | 19% | 9.8, critical | overdue exploit 1 advisory 3 | ||
| CVE-2017-7494 | CVE-2017-7494 | Samba | 99% | 9.8, critical | ransomware overdue exploit 2 patch 1 | ||
| CVE-2017-8540 | CVE-2017-8540 | Microsoft | 72% | 7.8, high | overdue exploit 1 patch 1 advisory 2 | ||
| CVE-2017-6862 | CVE-2017-6862 | NETGEAR | 46% | 9.8, critical | overdue advisory 3 | ||
| CVE-2017-0263 | CVE-2017-0263 | Microsoft | 10% | 7.8, high | overdue exploit 2 patch 1 advisory 2 | ||
| CVE-2017-0262 | CVE-2017-0262 | Microsoft | 81% | 7.8, high | overdue patch 1 advisory 1 | ||
| CVE-2017-0261 | CVE-2017-0261 | Microsoft | 78% | 7.8, high | overdue patch 1 advisory 2 | ||
| CVE-2017-0222 | CVE-2017-0222 | Microsoft | 30% | 8.8, high | overdue patch 1 advisory 2 | ||
| CVE-2017-0213 | CVE-2017-0213 | Microsoft | 84% | 7.3, high | ransomware overdue exploit 1 patch 1 | ||
| CVE-2017-7921 | CVE-2017-7921 | Hikvision | 100% | 9.8, critical | overdue patch 1 advisory 5 | ||
| CVE-2017-5689 | CVE-2017-5689 | Intel | 92% | 9.8, critical | overdue exploit 1 patch 2 advisory 7 | ||
| CVE-2017-8291 | CVE-2017-8291 | Artifex and 2 more vendors | 97% | 7.8, high | overdue exploit 2 patch 2 advisory 5 | ||
| CVE-2017-3066 | CVE-2017-3066 | Adobe | 91% | 9.8, critical | overdue exploit 1 patch 1 advisory 2 | ||
| CVE-2017-5030 | CVE-2017-5030 | Google and 5 more vendors | 41% | 8.8, high | overdue exploit 1 advisory 6 | ||
| CVE-2017-3506 | CVE-2017-3506 | Oracle and 1 more vendor | 96% | 7.4, high | overdue patch 1 advisory 2 | ||
| CVE-2016-1555 | CVE-2016-1555 | NETGEAR | 98% | 9.8, critical | overdue exploit 3 patch 1 | ||
| CVE-2017-0210 | CVE-2017-0210 | Microsoft | 22% | 8.8, high | overdue patch 1 advisory 2 | ||
| CVE-2017-0199 | CVE-2017-0199 | Microsoft | 99% | 7.8, high | ransomware overdue exploit 7 patch 1 | ||
| CVE-2017-6884 | CVE-2017-6884 | Zyxel | 33% | 8.8, high | ransomware overdue exploit 1 | ||
| CVE-2016-8735 | CVE-2016-8735 | Apache | 90% | 9.8, critical | overdue patch 23 advisory 13 | ||
| CVE-2014-3931 | CVE-2014-3931 | Looking Glass | 29% | 9.8, critical | overdue exploit 1 advisory 2 | ||
| CVE-2017-7269 | CVE-2017-7269 | Microsoft | 100% | 9.8, critical | overdue exploit 5 patch 2 advisory 3 | ||
| CVE-2017-3881 | CVE-2017-3881 | Cisco | 99% | 9.8, critical | overdue exploit 2 advisory 4 | ||
| CVE-2017-0149 | CVE-2017-0149 | Microsoft | 29% | 8.8, high | overdue patch 1 advisory 2 | ||
| CVE-2017-0148 | CVE-2017-0148 | Microsoft | 99% | 8.1, high | ransomware overdue exploit 4 patch 1 | ||
| CVE-2017-0147 | CVE-2017-0147 | Microsoft | 100% | 7.5, high | ransomware overdue exploit 5 patch 1 | ||
| CVE-2017-0146 | CVE-2017-0146 | Microsoft | 90% | 8.8, high | ransomware overdue exploit 5 patch 1 | ||
| CVE-2017-0145 | CVE-2017-0145 | Microsoft | 90% | 8.8, high | ransomware overdue exploit 4 patch 1 | ||
| CVE-2017-0144 | CVE-2017-0144 | Microsoft | 99% | 8.8, high | ransomware overdue exploit 6 patch 1 | ||
| CVE-2017-0143 | CVE-2017-0143 | Microsoft | 93% | 8.8, high | ransomware overdue exploit 5 patch 1 | ||
| CVE-2017-0101 | CVE-2017-0101 | Microsoft | 57% | 7.8, high | ransomware overdue exploit 1 patch 1 | ||
| CVE-2017-0059 | CVE-2017-0059 | Microsoft | 62% | 4.3, medium | overdue exploit 3 patch 1 advisory 2 | ||
| CVE-2017-0022 | CVE-2017-0022 | Microsoft | 18% | 6.5, medium | overdue exploit 1 patch 1 advisory 2 | ||
| CVE-2017-0005 | CVE-2017-0005 | Microsoft | 11% | 7.8, high | overdue exploit 1 patch 1 advisory 2 | ||
| CVE-2017-0001 | CVE-2017-0001 | Microsoft | 3% | 7.8, high | overdue patch 1 advisory 2 | ||
| CVE-2017-5638 | CVE-2017-5638 | Apache | 100% | 9.8, critical | ransomware overdue exploit 10 patch 1 | ||
| CVE-2017-6334 | CVE-2017-6334 | NETGEAR | 73% | 8.8, high | overdue exploit 3 advisory 1 | ||
| CVE-2017-0037 | CVE-2017-0037 | Microsoft | 80% | 8.1, high | overdue exploit 5 patch 1 advisory 3 | ||
| CVE-2017-6077 | CVE-2017-6077 | NETGEAR | 69% | 9.8, critical | overdue exploit 1 advisory 1 | ||
| CVE-2016-10174 | CVE-2016-10174 | NETGEAR | 83% | 9.8, critical | overdue exploit 4 advisory 2 | ||
| CVE-2016-5198 | CVE-2016-5198 | Google and 4 more vendors | 34% | 8.8, high | overdue exploit 1 advisory 4 | ||
| CVE-2017-5521 | CVE-2017-5521 | NETGEAR | 89% | 8.1, high | overdue exploit 1 advisory 2 | ||
| CVE-2016-10033 | CVE-2016-10033 | PHP and 2 more vendors | 100% | 9.8, critical | overdue exploit 15 patch 2 advisory 4 | ||
| CVE-2016-7262 | CVE-2016-7262 | Microsoft | 58% | 7.8, high | overdue patch 1 advisory 2 | ||
| CVE-2016-7892 | CVE-2016-7892 | Adobe and 4 more vendors | 19% | 8.8, high | overdue patch 2 advisory 5 | ||
| CVE-2016-6277 | CVE-2016-6277 | NETGEAR | 100% | 8.8, high | overdue exploit 4 patch 1 advisory 3 | ||
| CVE-2016-9563 | CVE-2016-9563 | SAP | 24% | 6.5, medium | overdue advisory 2 | ||
| CVE-2016-8562 | CVE-2016-8562 | Siemens | 4% | 7.5, high | overdue patch 1 advisory 3 | ||
| CVE-2016-7256 | CVE-2016-7256 | Microsoft | 65% | 8.8, high | overdue patch 1 advisory 2 | ||
How to read this
KEV means attacked, CVSS means attackable
CVSS scores how severe a flaw would be if exploited. The KEV date says CISA has evidence it is being exploited. A 7.5 in KEV is a more urgent patch than an unexploited 9.8.
EPSS is a probability, not a score
The modelled chance of exploitation activity in the next 30 days, from FIRST. The hairline under it is drawn to the same scale, so a short line really is a small chance.
Signals are a hint, not an inventory
exploit 3 means three references were classified as exploit code, from NVD's tags or the shape of the URL. overdue means a CISA remediation deadline has passed.
A slice, collected daily
The whole KEV catalogue, however old, plus the high and critical CVEs published in the last 90 days. Scores are as of the last collection, not the live upstream state. NVD holds the rest.