CVE Intelligence
Exploited and newly published vulnerabilities, ranked by whether they are being used, how likely they are to be, and whether a patch exists.
- CVEs held
- 3,164
- each with its own record page
- KEV listed, 30 days
- 35
- newest 16 Oct 2026
- Ransomware-linked
- 361
- confirmed by CISA
- Public exploit
- 883
- exploit code referenced
- Vendors
- 646
- named in affected products
- EPSS 90% or more
- 468
- 100% already known exploited
Counts of what we hold, not of every CVE ever filed. Collected from NVD, the CISA KEV catalogue (version 2026.10.16) and FIRST EPSS. Last collected .
Results
Every CVE in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog, with CVSS, EPSS and the references published for it. CISA lists a CVE only once there is evidence of exploitation against real targets, so this view answers what is being attacked, not what could be.
| CVE | Title | Vendor | KEV listed | Published | EPSS | CVSS | Signals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2023-32315 | CVE-2023-32315 | Ignite Realtime | 100% | 7.5, high | overdue exploit 2 | ||
| CVE-2023-38035 | CVE-2023-38035 | Ivanti | 100% | 9.8, critical | ransomware overdue exploit 1 advisory 1 | ||
| CVE-2017-18368 | CVE-2017-18368 | Zyxel and 1 more vendor | 94% | 9.8, critical | overdue exploit 3 advisory 1 | ||
| CVE-2023-35078 | CVE-2023-35078 | Ivanti | 100% | 9.8, critical | ransomware overdue exploit 1 advisory 3 | ||
| CVE-2023-3519 | CVE-2023-3519 | Citrix | 100% | 9.8, critical | ransomware overdue exploit 1 advisory 1 | ||
| CVE-2023-36884 | CVE-2023-36884 | Microsoft | 99% | 7.5, high | ransomware overdue exploit 1 patch 1 | ||
| CVE-2022-29303 | CVE-2022-29303 | SolarView | 98% | 9.8, critical | overdue exploit 2 | ||
| CVE-2023-36874 | CVE-2023-36874 | Microsoft | 43% | 7.8, high | overdue exploit 1 patch 1 | ||
| CVE-2023-32046 | CVE-2023-32046 | Microsoft | 10% | 7.8, high | overdue exploit 1 patch 1 | ||
| CVE-2022-31199 | CVE-2022-31199 | Netwrix | 36% | 9.8, critical | ransomware overdue exploit 1 | ||
| CVE-2019-20500 | CVE-2019-20500 | D-Link | 97% | 7.8, high | overdue exploit 1 patch 1 | ||
| CVE-2019-17621 | CVE-2019-17621 | D-Link | 90% | 9.8, critical | overdue exploit 2 patch 2 advisory 2 | ||
| CVE-2023-32434 | CVE-2023-32434 | Apple | 52% | 7.8, high | overdue exploit 1 advisory 8 | ||
| CVE-2023-20887 | CVE-2023-20887 | VMware | 98% | 9.8, critical | overdue exploit 1 patch 1 | ||
| CVE-2020-12641 | CVE-2020-12641 | Roundcube and 1 more vendor | 84% | 9.8, critical | overdue exploit 1 patch 1 advisory 3 | ||
| CVE-2016-9079 | CVE-2016-9079 | Mozilla | 88% | 7.5, high | overdue exploit 3 advisory 8 | ||
| CVE-2016-0165 | CVE-2016-0165 | Microsoft | 14% | 7.8, high | overdue exploit 1 patch 1 advisory 2 | ||
| CVE-2023-3079 | CVE-2023-3079 | 38% | 8.8, high | overdue exploit 3 advisory 7 | |||
| CVE-2023-34362 | CVE-2023-34362 | Progress | 100% | 9.8, critical | ransomware overdue exploit 2 advisory 1 | ||
| CVE-2023-28771 | CVE-2023-28771 | Zyxel | 99% | 9.8, critical | overdue exploit 1 advisory 1 | ||
| CVE-2023-25717 | CVE-2023-25717 | Ruckus Wireless and 1 more vendor | 98% | 9.8, critical | overdue exploit 1 patch 1 | ||
| CVE-2021-3560 | CVE-2021-3560 | Red Hat and 3 more vendors | 24% | 7.8, high | overdue exploit 3 patch 1 | ||
| CVE-2014-0196 | CVE-2014-0196 | Linux and 6 more vendors | 22% | 5.5, medium | overdue exploit 3 patch 2 advisory 19 | ||
| CVE-2010-3904 | CVE-2010-3904 | Linux and 5 more vendors | 16% | 7.8, high | overdue exploit 2 patch 2 advisory 14 | ||
| CVE-2023-29336 | CVE-2023-29336 | Microsoft | 41% | 7.8, high | overdue exploit 1 patch 1 | ||
| CVE-2023-21839 | CVE-2023-21839 | Oracle | 100% | 7.5, high | overdue exploit 1 patch 1 | ||
| CVE-2023-1389 | CVE-2023-1389 | TP-Link | 100% | 8.8, high | overdue exploit 2 | ||
| CVE-2023-28432 | CVE-2023-28432 | MinIO | 84% | 7.5, high | overdue exploit 1 advisory 3 | ||
| CVE-2023-27350 | CVE-2023-27350 | PaperCut | 100% | 9.8, critical | ransomware overdue exploit 4 advisory 3 | ||
| CVE-2023-28252 | CVE-2023-28252 | Microsoft | 49% | 7.8, high | ransomware overdue exploit 1 patch 1 | ||
| CVE-2021-27878 | CVE-2021-27878 | Veritas | 24% | 8.8, high | ransomware overdue exploit 1 advisory 1 | ||
| CVE-2021-27877 | CVE-2021-27877 | Veritas | 65% | 9.8, critical | ransomware overdue exploit 1 advisory 1 | ||
| CVE-2021-27876 | CVE-2021-27876 | Veritas | 14% | 8.1, high | ransomware overdue exploit 1 advisory 1 | ||
| CVE-2022-38181 | CVE-2022-38181 | Arm | 14% | 8.8, high | overdue exploit 3 advisory 2 | ||
| CVE-2022-3038 | CVE-2022-3038 | Google and 1 more vendor | 25% | 8.8, high | overdue exploit 2 advisory 2 | ||
| CVE-2017-7494 | CVE-2017-7494 | Samba | 99% | 9.8, critical | ransomware overdue exploit 2 patch 1 | ||
| CVE-2023-26360 | CVE-2023-26360 | Adobe | 97% | 8.6, high | overdue exploit 1 patch 1 advisory 1 | ||
| CVE-2021-39144 | CVE-2021-39144 | XStream | 98% | 8.5, high | overdue exploit 2 patch 3 advisory 4 | ||
| CVE-2020-5741 | CVE-2020-5741 | Plex and 1 more vendor | 73% | 7.2, high | overdue exploit 2 | ||
| CVE-2022-35914 | CVE-2022-35914 | Teclib | 100% | 9.8, critical | overdue exploit 3 patch 1 advisory 3 | ||
| CVE-2022-33891 | CVE-2022-33891 | Apache | 93% | 8.8, high | overdue exploit 1 advisory 3 | ||
| CVE-2022-28810 | CVE-2022-28810 | Zoho | 71% | 6.8, medium | overdue exploit 3 patch 1 | ||
| CVE-2022-47986 | CVE-2022-47986 | IBM | 100% | 9.8, critical | ransomware overdue exploit 1 patch 1 | ||
| CVE-2022-46169 | CVE-2022-46169 | Cacti | 100% | 9.8, critical | overdue exploit 1 patch 3 | ||
| CVE-2023-0669 | CVE-2023-0669 | Fortra | 100% | 7.2, high | ransomware overdue exploit 3 patch 2 | ||
| CVE-2022-24990 | CVE-2022-24990 | TerraMaster | 83% | 7.5, high | ransomware overdue exploit 3 advisory 1 | ||
| CVE-2015-2291 | CVE-2015-2291 | Intel and 1 more vendor | 9% | 7.8, high | ransomware overdue exploit 2 patch 1 | ||
| CVE-2023-22952 | CVE-2023-22952 | SugarCRM | 80% | 8.8, high | overdue exploit 1 advisory 1 | ||
| CVE-2022-21587 | CVE-2022-21587 | Oracle | 98% | 9.8, critical | ransomware overdue exploit 1 patch 1 | ||
| CVE-2017-11357 | CVE-2017-11357 | Telerik | 78% | 9.8, critical | ransomware overdue exploit 1 advisory 1 | ||
| CVE-2022-47966 | CVE-2022-47966 | Zoho | 100% | 9.8, critical | ransomware overdue exploit 6 patch 1 | ||
| CVE-2022-44877 | CVE-2022-44877 | CWP | 100% | 9.8, critical | overdue exploit 6 | ||
| CVE-2018-5430 | CVE-2018-5430 | TIBCO | 48% | 8.8, high | overdue exploit 2 advisory 1 | ||
| CVE-2018-18809 | CVE-2018-18809 | TIBCO | 79% | 6.5, medium | overdue exploit 4 advisory 3 | ||
| CVE-2022-42856 | CVE-2022-42856 | Apple | 9% | 8.8, high | overdue exploit 5 advisory 7 | ||
| CVE-2022-42475 | CVE-2022-42475 | Fortinet | 99% | 9.8, critical | ransomware overdue exploit 1 | ||
| CVE-2022-4135 | CVE-2022-4135 | 32% | 9.6, critical | overdue exploit 1 advisory 2 | |||
| CVE-2022-41073 | CVE-2022-41073 | Microsoft | 2% | 7.8, high | ransomware overdue exploit 1 patch 1 | ||
| CVE-2020-3433 | CVE-2020-3433 | Cisco | 10% | 7.8, high | ransomware overdue exploit 1 advisory 1 | ||
| CVE-2020-3153 | CVE-2020-3153 | Cisco | 28% | 6.5, medium | ransomware overdue exploit 4 advisory 1 | ||
| CVE-2018-19323 | CVE-2018-19323 | GIGABYTE | 8% | 9.8, critical | ransomware overdue exploit 2 advisory 2 | ||
| CVE-2018-19322 | CVE-2018-19322 | GIGABYTE | 2% | 7.8, high | ransomware overdue exploit 2 advisory 2 | ||
| CVE-2018-19321 | CVE-2018-19321 | GIGABYTE | 4% | 7.8, high | ransomware overdue exploit 2 advisory 2 | ||
| CVE-2018-19320 | CVE-2018-19320 | GIGABYTE | 4% | 7.8, high | ransomware overdue exploit 2 advisory 2 | ||
| CVE-2022-41352 | CVE-2022-41352 | Synacor | 95% | 9.8, critical | ransomware overdue exploit 1 patch 2 | ||
| CVE-2021-3493 | CVE-2021-3493 | Linux | 49% | 7.8, high | overdue exploit 3 patch 1 advisory 2 | ||
| CVE-2022-40684 | CVE-2022-40684 | Fortinet | 100% | 9.8, critical | ransomware overdue exploit 2 advisory 1 | ||
| CVE-2022-41082 | CVE-2022-41082 | Microsoft | 100% | 8, high | ransomware overdue exploit 1 patch 2 | ||
| CVE-2022-41040 | CVE-2022-41040 | Microsoft | 100% | 8.8, high | ransomware overdue exploit 1 patch 3 | ||
| CVE-2022-36804 | CVE-2022-36804 | Atlassian | 99% | 8.8, high | overdue exploit 2 patch 1 | ||
| CVE-2022-35405 | CVE-2022-35405 | Zoho | 100% | 9.8, critical | overdue exploit 1 patch 1 | ||
| CVE-2013-6282 | CVE-2013-6282 | Linux | 40% | 8.8, high | overdue exploit 2 patch 2 advisory 4 | ||
| CVE-2013-2596 | CVE-2013-2596 | Linux and 2 more vendors | 3% | 7.8, high | overdue exploit 4 patch 5 advisory 6 | ||
| CVE-2013-2094 | CVE-2013-2094 | Linux | 48% | 8.4, high | overdue exploit 2 patch 3 advisory 21 | ||
| CVE-2010-2568 | CVE-2010-2568 | Microsoft | 91% | 7.8, high | overdue exploit 3 patch 3 advisory 6 | ||
| CVE-2022-32917 | CVE-2022-32917 | Apple | 6% | 7.8, high | overdue exploit 4 advisory 4 | ||
| CVE-2022-26258 | CVE-2022-26258 | D-Link | 92% | 9.8, critical | overdue exploit 2 advisory 1 | ||
| CVE-2018-7445 | CVE-2018-7445 | MikroTik | 61% | 9.8, critical | overdue exploit 3 advisory 1 | ||
| CVE-2018-6530 | CVE-2018-6530 | D-Link | 97% | 9.8, critical | ransomware overdue exploit 1 patch 4 | ||
| CVE-2018-2628 | CVE-2018-2628 | Oracle | 100% | 9.8, critical | overdue exploit 3 patch 1 advisory 2 | ||
| CVE-2017-5521 | CVE-2017-5521 | NETGEAR | 89% | 8.1, high | overdue exploit 1 advisory 2 | ||
| CVE-2011-1823 | CVE-2011-1823 | Android | 41% | 7.8, high | overdue exploit 3 patch 4 advisory 1 | ||
| CVE-2022-26352 | CVE-2022-26352 | dotCMS | 91% | 9.8, critical | ransomware overdue exploit 1 advisory 1 | ||
| CVE-2022-24706 | CVE-2022-24706 | Apache | 93% | 9.8, critical | overdue exploit 3 patch 3 advisory 3 | ||
| CVE-2022-24112 | CVE-2022-24112 | Apache | 96% | 9.8, critical | overdue exploit 2 advisory 3 | ||
| CVE-2022-22963 | CVE-2022-22963 | VMware Tanzu and 1 more vendor | 100% | 9.8, critical | overdue exploit 1 patch 2 advisory 3 | ||
| CVE-2021-39226 | CVE-2021-39226 | Grafana Labs | 100% | 7.3, high | overdue exploit 1 patch 1 advisory 2 | ||
| CVE-2020-28949 | CVE-2020-28949 | PEAR and 3 more vendors | 85% | 7.8, high | overdue exploit 2 advisory 10 | ||
| CVE-2022-32894 | CVE-2022-32894 | Apple | 3% | 7.8, high | overdue exploit 3 advisory 4 | ||
| CVE-2022-32893 | CVE-2022-32893 | Apple | 10% | 8.8, high | overdue exploit 2 advisory 13 | ||
| CVE-2022-2856 | CVE-2022-2856 | Google and 1 more vendor | 5% | 6.5, medium | overdue exploit 1 patch 1 | ||
| CVE-2017-15944 | CVE-2017-15944 | Palo Alto Networks | 98% | 9.8, critical | overdue exploit 2 advisory 3 | ||
| CVE-2022-37042 | CVE-2022-37042 | Synacor | 92% | 9.8, critical | ransomware overdue exploit 1 patch 1 | ||
| CVE-2022-27925 | CVE-2022-27925 | Synacor | 99% | 7.2, high | ransomware overdue exploit 1 advisory 3 | ||
| CVE-2022-30333 | CVE-2022-30333 | RARLAB and 3 more vendors | 99% | 7.5, high | ransomware overdue exploit 2 patch 1 | ||
| CVE-2021-4034 | CVE-2021-4034 | Red Hat and 6 more vendors | 95% | 7.8, high | ransomware overdue exploit 5 patch 3 | ||
| CVE-2021-30533 | CVE-2021-30533 | 17% | 6.5, medium | overdue exploit 1 advisory 2 | |||
| CVE-2022-30190 | CVE-2022-30190 | Microsoft | 99% | 7.8, high | ransomware overdue exploit 1 patch 1 | ||
| CVE-2016-2388 | CVE-2016-2388 | SAP | 52% | 5.3, medium | overdue exploit 5 advisory 2 | ||
| CVE-2016-2386 | CVE-2016-2386 | SAP | 72% | 9.8, critical | overdue exploit 5 advisory 2 | ||
How to read this
KEV means attacked, CVSS means attackable
CVSS scores how severe a flaw would be if exploited. The KEV date says CISA has evidence it is being exploited. A 7.5 in KEV is a more urgent patch than an unexploited 9.8.
EPSS is a probability, not a score
The modelled chance of exploitation activity in the next 30 days, from FIRST. The hairline under it is drawn to the same scale, so a short line really is a small chance.
Signals are a hint, not an inventory
exploit 3 means three references were classified as exploit code, from NVD's tags or the shape of the URL. overdue means a CISA remediation deadline has passed.
A slice, collected daily
The whole KEV catalogue, however old, plus the high and critical CVEs published in the last 90 days. Scores are as of the last collection, not the live upstream state. NVD holds the rest.