CVE Intelligence
Exploited and newly published vulnerabilities, ranked by whether they are being used, how likely they are to be, and whether a patch exists.
- CVEs held
- 3,164
- each with its own record page
- KEV listed, 30 days
- 35
- newest 16 Oct 2026
- Ransomware-linked
- 361
- confirmed by CISA
- Public exploit
- 883
- exploit code referenced
- Vendors
- 646
- named in affected products
- EPSS 90% or more
- 468
- 100% already known exploited
Counts of what we hold, not of every CVE ever filed. Collected from NVD, the CISA KEV catalogue (version 2026.10.16) and FIRST EPSS. Last collected .
Results
Every CVE in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog, with CVSS, EPSS and the references published for it. CISA lists a CVE only once there is evidence of exploitation against real targets, so this view answers what is being attacked, not what could be.
| CVE | Title | Vendor | KEV listed | Published | EPSS | CVSS | Signals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-54236 | CVE-2025-54236 | Adobe | 95% | 9.1, critical | overdue exploit 1 advisory 2 | ||
| CVE-2025-61932 | CVE-2025-61932 | Motex | 3% | 9.3, critical | overdue advisory 3 | ||
| CVE-2025-61884 | CVE-2025-61884 | Oracle | 96% | 7.5, high | ransomware overdue exploit 1 advisory 2 | ||
| CVE-2025-33073 | CVE-2025-33073 | Microsoft | 83% | 8.8, high | overdue advisory 3 | ||
| CVE-2025-2747 | CVE-2025-2747 | Kentico | 97% | 9.8, critical | overdue exploit 1 patch 1 advisory 2 | ||
| CVE-2025-2746 | CVE-2025-2746 | Kentico | 74% | 9.8, critical | overdue exploit 1 patch 1 advisory 2 | ||
| CVE-2022-48503 | CVE-2022-48503 | Apple | 3% | 8.8, high | overdue advisory 5 | ||
| CVE-2025-54253 | CVE-2025-54253 | Adobe | 88% | 10, critical | overdue exploit 1 advisory 2 | ||
| CVE-2025-59230 | CVE-2025-59230 | Microsoft | 3% | 7.8, high | overdue advisory 3 | ||
| CVE-2025-47827 | CVE-2025-47827 | IGEL and 1 more vendor | 5% | 4.6, medium | overdue exploit 1 advisory 1 | ||
| CVE-2025-24990 | CVE-2025-24990 | Microsoft | 6% | 7.8, high | overdue advisory 3 | ||
| CVE-2016-7836 | CVE-2016-7836 | SKYSEA | 19% | 9.8, critical | overdue exploit 1 advisory 3 | ||
| CVE-2021-43798 | CVE-2021-43798 | Grafana Labs | 89% | 7.5, high | overdue exploit 2 patch 4 advisory 2 | ||
| CVE-2025-27915 | CVE-2025-27915 | Synacor | 4% | 5.4, medium | overdue exploit 1 advisory 4 | ||
| CVE-2025-61882 | CVE-2025-61882 | Oracle | 100% | 9.8, critical | ransomware overdue advisory 2 | ||
| CVE-2021-43226 | CVE-2021-43226 | Microsoft | 3% | 7.8, high | ransomware overdue patch 1 | ||
| CVE-2021-22555 | CVE-2021-22555 | Linux and 2 more vendors | 79% | 7.8, high | overdue exploit 6 patch 2 advisory 1 | ||
| CVE-2013-3918 | CVE-2013-3918 | Microsoft | 74% | 8.8, high | overdue patch 1 advisory 6 | ||
| CVE-2011-3402 | CVE-2011-3402 | Microsoft | 78% | 8.8, high | overdue advisory 13 | ||
| CVE-2010-3962 | CVE-2010-3962 | Microsoft | 97% | 8.1, high | overdue exploit 2 patch 2 advisory 9 | ||
| CVE-2010-3765 | CVE-2010-3765 | Mozilla | 83% | 9.8, critical | overdue exploit 3 advisory 42 | ||
| CVE-2025-4008 | CVE-2025-4008 | Smartbedded | 94% | 8.8, high | overdue exploit 1 advisory 1 | ||
| CVE-2025-21043 | CVE-2025-21043 | Samsung | 2% | 9.8, critical | overdue advisory 1 | ||
| CVE-2017-1000353 | CVE-2017-1000353 | Jenkins and 1 more vendor | 100% | 9.8, critical | overdue exploit 2 patch 1 advisory 2 | ||
| CVE-2015-7755 | CVE-2015-7755 | Juniper | 61% | 9.8, critical | overdue exploit 1 advisory 8 | ||
| CVE-2014-6278 | CVE-2014-6278 | GNU | 100% | 8.8, high | overdue exploit 4 patch 1 advisory 67 | ||
| CVE-2025-59689 | CVE-2025-59689 | Libraesva | 2% | 6.1, medium | overdue advisory 2 | ||
| CVE-2025-32463 | CVE-2025-32463 | Sudo | 55% | 7.8, high | overdue exploit 2 advisory 13 | ||
| CVE-2025-20352 | CVE-2025-20352 | Cisco | 40% | 7.7, high | overdue advisory 1 | ||
| CVE-2025-10035 | CVE-2025-10035 | Fortra | 100% | 9.8, critical | ransomware overdue advisory 1 | ||
| CVE-2021-21311 | CVE-2021-21311 | Adminer | 98% | 7.2, high | overdue exploit 1 patch 2 advisory 2 | ||
| CVE-2025-20362 | CVE-2025-20362 | Cisco | 87% | 8.6, high | overdue advisory 2 | ||
| CVE-2025-20333 | CVE-2025-20333 | Cisco | 71% | 9.9, critical | overdue advisory 2 | ||
| CVE-2025-10585 | CVE-2025-10585 | Google and 1 more vendor | 5% | 9.8, critical | overdue advisory 2 | ||
| CVE-2025-5086 | CVE-2025-5086 | Dassault Systèmes | 97% | 9, critical | overdue exploit 1 advisory 1 | ||
| CVE-2025-53690 | CVE-2025-53690 | Sitecore | 61% | 9, critical | overdue exploit 1 advisory 1 | ||
| CVE-2025-48543 | CVE-2025-48543 | Android | 0.6% | 8.8, high | overdue patch 1 advisory 2 | ||
| CVE-2025-38352 | CVE-2025-38352 | Linux | 1% | 7.8, high | overdue exploit 1 patch 8 advisory 2 | ||
| CVE-2025-9377 | CVE-2025-9377 | TP-Link | 38% | 7.2, high | overdue advisory 1 | ||
| CVE-2023-50224 | CVE-2023-50224 | TP-Link | 20% | 6.5, medium | overdue advisory 2 | ||
| CVE-2025-55177 | CVE-2025-55177 | Meta Platforms | 5% | 5.4, medium | overdue advisory 2 | ||
| CVE-2020-24363 | CVE-2020-24363 | TP-Link | 22% | 8.8, high | overdue advisory 2 | ||
| CVE-2025-57819 | CVE-2025-57819 | Sangoma | 86% | 9.8, critical | overdue exploit 1 advisory 2 | ||
| CVE-2025-7775 | CVE-2025-7775 | Citrix | 20% | 9.8, critical | overdue advisory 1 | ||
| CVE-2025-48384 | CVE-2025-48384 | Git | 4% | 8, high | overdue exploit 1 advisory 3 | ||
| CVE-2024-8069 | CVE-2024-8069 | Citrix | 15% | 8, high | overdue advisory 1 | ||
| CVE-2024-8068 | CVE-2024-8068 | Citrix | 3% | 8, high | overdue advisory 1 | ||
| CVE-2025-43300 | CVE-2025-43300 | Apple | 32% | 10, critical | overdue exploit 4 advisory 7 | ||
| CVE-2025-54948 | CVE-2025-54948 | Trend Micro | 24% | 9.8, critical | overdue patch 1 | ||
| CVE-2025-8876 | CVE-2025-8876 | N-able | 3% | 8.8, high | overdue | ||
| CVE-2025-8875 | CVE-2025-8875 | N-able | 2% | 7.8, high | overdue | ||
| CVE-2025-8088 | CVE-2025-8088 | RARLAB | 95% | 8.8, high | ransomware overdue advisory 5 | ||
| CVE-2013-3893 | CVE-2013-3893 | Microsoft | 88% | 8.8, high | overdue exploit 3 advisory 7 | ||
| CVE-2007-0671 | CVE-2007-0671 | Microsoft | 43% | 8.8, high | overdue advisory 10 | ||
| CVE-2022-40799 | CVE-2022-40799 | D-Link | 34% | 8.8, high | overdue exploit 1 | ||
| CVE-2020-25079 | CVE-2020-25079 | D-Link | 54% | 8.8, high | overdue exploit 1 patch 1 | ||
| CVE-2020-25078 | CVE-2020-25078 | D-Link | 98% | 7.5, high | overdue patch 1 advisory 1 | ||
| CVE-2025-20337 | CVE-2025-20337 | Cisco | 68% | 10, critical | overdue advisory 1 | ||
| CVE-2025-20281 | CVE-2025-20281 | Cisco | 98% | 10, critical | overdue exploit 1 advisory 1 | ||
| CVE-2023-2533 | CVE-2023-2533 | PaperCut | 29% | 8.8, high | overdue exploit 1 advisory 1 | ||
| CVE-2025-6558 | CVE-2025-6558 | 11% | 8.8, high | overdue exploit 5 advisory 3 | |||
| CVE-2025-54309 | CVE-2025-54309 | CrushFTP | 95% | 9.8, critical | overdue advisory 4 | ||
| CVE-2025-49706 | CVE-2025-49706 | Microsoft | 99% | 6.5, medium | ransomware overdue advisory 2 | ||
| CVE-2025-49704 | CVE-2025-49704 | Microsoft | 100% | 8.8, high | ransomware overdue advisory 2 | ||
| CVE-2025-2776 | CVE-2025-2776 | SysAid | 65% | 9.8, critical | overdue exploit 1 | ||
| CVE-2025-2775 | CVE-2025-2775 | SysAid | 43% | 7.5, high | overdue exploit 1 | ||
| CVE-2025-53770 | CVE-2025-53770 | Microsoft | 100% | 9.8, critical | ransomware overdue exploit 3 patch 2 | ||
| CVE-2025-25257 | CVE-2025-25257 | Fortinet | 100% | 9.8, critical | overdue exploit 2 advisory 2 | ||
| CVE-2025-47812 | CVE-2025-47812 | Wing FTP Server | 94% | 10, critical | overdue exploit 2 advisory 2 | ||
| CVE-2025-5777 | CVE-2025-5777 | Citrix | 100% | 7.5, high | ransomware overdue patch 1 advisory 7 | ||
| CVE-2019-9621 | CVE-2019-9621 | Synacor | 81% | 7.5, high | overdue exploit 4 advisory 4 | ||
| CVE-2019-5418 | CVE-2019-5418 | Rails | 99% | 7.5, high | overdue exploit 2 patch 3 advisory 8 | ||
| CVE-2016-10033 | CVE-2016-10033 | PHP and 2 more vendors | 100% | 9.8, critical | overdue exploit 15 patch 2 advisory 4 | ||
| CVE-2014-3931 | CVE-2014-3931 | Looking Glass | 29% | 9.8, critical | overdue exploit 1 advisory 2 | ||
| CVE-2025-6554 | CVE-2025-6554 | 14% | 8.1, high | overdue advisory 1 | |||
| CVE-2025-48928 | CVE-2025-48928 | TeleMessage | 0.6% | 4, medium | overdue | ||
| CVE-2025-48927 | CVE-2025-48927 | TeleMessage | 11% | 5.3, medium | overdue | ||
| CVE-2025-6543 | CVE-2025-6543 | Citrix | 11% | 9.8, critical | overdue advisory 1 | ||
| CVE-2024-54085 | CVE-2024-54085 | AMI | 61% | 9.8, critical | overdue advisory 6 | ||
| CVE-2024-0769 | CVE-2024-0769 | D-Link and 1 more vendor | 83% | 9.8, critical | overdue exploit 1 advisory 2 | ||
| CVE-2019-6693 | CVE-2019-6693 | Fortinet | 7% | 6.5, medium | ransomware overdue advisory 1 | ||
| CVE-2023-0386 | CVE-2023-0386 | Linux and 3 more vendors | 8% | 7.8, high | overdue exploit 1 patch 1 advisory 4 | ||
| CVE-2025-43200 | CVE-2025-43200 | Apple | 1% | 4.2, medium | overdue advisory 9 | ||
| CVE-2023-33538 | CVE-2023-33538 | TP-Link | 42% | 8.8, high | overdue exploit 2 advisory 1 | ||
| CVE-2025-33053 | CVE-2025-33053 | Microsoft | 87% | 8.8, high | overdue exploit 3 patch 1 advisory 2 | ||
| CVE-2025-24016 | CVE-2025-24016 | Wazuh | 94% | 9.9, critical | overdue exploit 1 | ||
| CVE-2025-32433 | CVE-2025-32433 | Erlang | 99% | 10, critical | overdue exploit 1 patch 3 advisory 9 | ||
| CVE-2024-42009 | CVE-2024-42009 | Roundcube | 83% | 9.3, critical | overdue advisory 2 | ||
| CVE-2025-5419 | CVE-2025-5419 | 8% | 8.8, high | overdue advisory 1 | |||
| CVE-2025-27038 | CVE-2025-27038 | Qualcomm | 1% | 7.5, high | overdue advisory 1 | ||
| CVE-2025-21480 | CVE-2025-21480 | Qualcomm | 0.5% | 8.6, high | overdue advisory 1 | ||
| CVE-2025-21479 | CVE-2025-21479 | Qualcomm | 0.8% | 8.6, high | overdue advisory 1 | ||
| CVE-2025-3935 | CVE-2025-3935 | ConnectWise | 4% | 7.2, high | overdue patch 1 advisory 1 | ||
| CVE-2025-35939 | CVE-2025-35939 | Craft CMS | 1% | 5.3, medium | overdue patch 1 advisory 1 | ||
| CVE-2024-56145 | CVE-2024-56145 | Craft CMS | 97% | 9.8, critical | overdue exploit 1 patch 1 advisory 1 | ||
| CVE-2023-39780 | CVE-2023-39780 | ASUS | 40% | 8.8, high | overdue exploit 7 | ||
| CVE-2021-32030 | CVE-2021-32030 | ASUS | 99% | 9.8, critical | overdue exploit 2 | ||
| CVE-2025-4632 | CVE-2025-4632 | Samsung | 24% | 9.8, critical | overdue patch 1 | ||
| CVE-2025-4428 | CVE-2025-4428 | Ivanti | 87% | 8.8, high | overdue advisory 1 | ||
| CVE-2025-4427 | CVE-2025-4427 | Ivanti | 100% | 7.5, high | overdue advisory 1 | ||
How to read this
KEV means attacked, CVSS means attackable
CVSS scores how severe a flaw would be if exploited. The KEV date says CISA has evidence it is being exploited. A 7.5 in KEV is a more urgent patch than an unexploited 9.8.
EPSS is a probability, not a score
The modelled chance of exploitation activity in the next 30 days, from FIRST. The hairline under it is drawn to the same scale, so a short line really is a small chance.
Signals are a hint, not an inventory
exploit 3 means three references were classified as exploit code, from NVD's tags or the shape of the URL. overdue means a CISA remediation deadline has passed.
A slice, collected daily
The whole KEV catalogue, however old, plus the high and critical CVEs published in the last 90 days. Scores are as of the last collection, not the live upstream state. NVD holds the rest.